Strategic Partnerships in Power-to-X: Building a Strong Consortia for a Successful Energy Transition

Strategic Partnerships in Power-to-X: Building a Strong Consortia for a Successful Energy Transition

Scaling Services

Spikes in demand and organisation-critical projects require resources beyond your current headcount.

The Power-to-X Opportunity Is Growing

Power-to-X (P2X) is rapidly emerging as a central pillar of the green energy transition. By converting surplus renewable electricity into storable and transportable molecules such as hydrogen, ammonia, or e-methane, P2X offers a tangible pathway to decarbonise sectors that are traditionally difficult to abate, such as industry, heavy transport, and heating.

As momentum builds and billions of euros in investment are directed toward these technologies, one thing is becoming increasingly clear: no single company today holds all the capabilities required to develop and deliver a successful P2X project. These projects sit at the intersection of multiple complex disciplines, from renewable energy generation and chemical engineering to storage of molecules, technology partners, regulatory navigation, infrastructure deployment, and long-term financing, not to mention the offtake partner within steel, chemicals, refinery,  shipping and so on.

This is why strategic partnerships, especially through well-structured consortia, have become the dominant model for P2X project development. Collaboration within P2X is not just helpful, it is essential. A well-designed consortium allows companies to pool expertise, share risk, and accelerate innovation. When done well, these partnerships create scalable, bankable, and future-proof energy assets. When done poorly, they can result in delays, misalignment, and failed investments.

This article explores the key capabilities needed to execute a successful P2X project, the steps to forming a strong partnership, and how to structure and manage consortia to ensure long-term success.

Why Strategic Partnerships Are Essential in P2X

Power-to-X projects are inherently complex. Unlike standalone renewable energy developments, P2X involves an integrated value chain that spans electricity production, chemical transformation, infrastructure development, regulatory compliance, and end-market distribution.

A typical project may involve a wind or solar farm (or a combination) feeding electricity into an electrolyser, which produces hydrogen that is either transported directly or converted into ammonia or methanol. These end-products then need to be stored, transported, and sold, often across borders and into tightly regulated markets. The technology is still evolving, and the regulatory environment remains dynamic. Financing is capital-intensive, timelines are long, and the risks are substantial.

This complexity means that no single developer, utility, industrial gases company, electrolyser OEM, offtake, port operator, CO2 provider (for methanol), or technology provider can deliver the entire value chain on their own. Partnerships are not optional, they are foundational. Strategic consortia bring together actors with complementary strengths: one may bring access to renewable resources, another may provide process engineering and plant operation expertise, while others may contribute political influence, port access, or financial expertise.

The Capabilities Required for a Successful P2X Project

To develop a viable P2X project, a wide array of specialised competencies must be brought together. First and foremost is the ability to generate renewable energy, typically through wind or solar installations. This includes site selection, permitting, grid connection, and long-term resource availability, all of which require local knowledge and development experience.

Equally critical is the expertise in P2X process development. This includes designing the chemical processes and integrating components such as electrolysers, synthesis units, storage systems, and downstream transport. Engineering firms with experience in large-scale industrial projects, EPC contractors, and O&M specialists play key roles here.

Offtake structuring is another essential element. Projects must secure long-term buyers for their green fuels or feedstocks, whether from steel producers, chemical users, refineries or mobility companies. These offtake agreements are crucial to ensuring bankability and must be carefully structured to align with project economics and timelines.

Navigating the regulatory landscape is no less important. Projects must comply with national permitting regimes, environmental standards, safety regulations, and grid requirements. Close coordination with grid operators, local authorities, and sometimes even ministries is often required.

Financing also plays a decisive role. These projects demand substantial up-front capital, and securing funding, either through project finance or balance-sheet investment, as well as subsidies, requires a compelling investment case, risk-sharing mechanisms, and clear cost structures.

Finally, for export-oriented projects, partners with access to logistics infrastructure are essential. This includes ports with the capability to handle hydrogen carriers, maritime shipping companies, and regulators who can enable safe international transport of green fuels.

All of these capabilities must work together in harmony. If even one is missing or underdeveloped, the project may struggle to move beyond the feasibility stage.

Figure 1: Example of key consortia partners that are often seen in Power-to-X projects

Choosing the Right Partners

Forming a successful consortium starts with careful partner selection. Financial strength is one of the first considerations. A strong balance sheet and willingness to commit resources during the joint development phase can set the tone for the entire project.

Beyond finance, the technical and operational track record of a partner matters immensely. Have they delivered similar-scale projects in the past? Do they have experience with the specific technology or market segment you are targeting? A well-positioned technical partner can bring not just credibility, but practical know-how that improves timelines and reduces risk.

Strategic alignment is another key dimension. It is important to understand whether a partner’s business goals are complementary to your own. Are they aiming to enter a new market, to learn by doing, or to control a specific part of the value chain? Misalignment in ambition often leads to misalignment in execution.

Cultural fit and organisational compatibility can’t be overlooked. Partnerships involve teams working closely together over extended periods, sometimes across borders and languages. Shared expectations, collaborative decision-making styles, and mutual respect are often more important than any single capability.

Geographical presence and local stakeholder access also play a critical role. A partner with strong relationships in the host country, be it with regulators, grid operators, or local communities, can dramatically accelerate project progress and reduce friction.

Structuring the Partnership and Workstreams

Once the partners are identified, the next step is to clearly define how they will work together. A consortium is only as effective as the structure that holds it together.

The first component is governance. A steering committee should be established with representation from each partner, empowered to make key decisions and resolve issues. This committee must be supported by working groups focused on technical development, commercial development, permitting, financing, and stakeholder engagement.

Workstreams should be mapped to each partner’s core strengths. For instance, the renewable energy developer might lead on grid connection and renewable plant development, while the engineering partner leads the design and permitting of the chemical plant. Commercial teams may jointly tackle offtake contracts, market analysis, and subsidy applications. A shared project timeline and milestone structure ensures that dependencies are identified and managed proactively.

Transparency and accountability are vital. Each workstream should have a clear lead, a set of deliverables, and regular reporting into the wider consortium. Misunderstandings around roles and responsibilities can lead to duplication of effort, or worse, to critical tasks being neglected.

Contracts and Agreements: Frameworks for Cooperation

Formalizing the partnership through well-drafted agreements is essential, especially through the . Most P2X consortia use at least two core contracts: Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and a Joint Development Agreement (JDA).

The MoU is a non-binding early-stage agreement that sets the tone and outlines the high-level principles of collaboration. It defines the purpose of the consortium, the governance model, decision-making processes, intellectual property rules, and exit mechanisms. It also sets expectations around timelines, confidentiality, and communication.

The JDA is binding and goes deeper, and in addition is laying out the concrete project development tasks, budgets, risk-sharing arrangements, and timelines. It defines who does what, by when, and under what conditions. It also addresses liabilities, dispute resolution, and the commercial structure leading up to a final investment decision.

Both documents should be negotiated early, ideally before significant resources are committed. There are also other important documents to agree upon, and which those are depends on the stage the project is in when the consortia is formed.

Managing the Partnership Over Time

Even the best-structured partnership requires strong day-to-day management. Communication is key, partners must stay aligned through regular updates, open dialogue, and transparent documentation.

A dedicated project management function should coordinate all workstreams, track progress, manage dependencies, and escalate issues to the steering committee. This is often most effective when led by a neutral third party, such as an experienced consultancy, who can act without bias, maintain an open dialogue with all parties, and focus on delivery.

Managing risk is a continuous process. Market conditions change, policies evolve, and technology prices shift. Periodic strategic reviews help ensure the consortium remains adaptable and that decisions reflect the current landscape.

It is also important to plan for conflict. Disagreements will happen, whether around scope, costs, or external pressures. Having pre-agreed mechanisms for dispute resolution, and a culture of constructive problem-solving, can prevent small issues from becoming project-threatening rifts.

Common Conflict Points and How to Resolve Them

Most conflicts within P2X partnerships arise from predictable patterns. Misalignment on timelines is a common issue, particularly when internal approval processes vary between partners. Cost disputes can also emerge, especially if CAPEX or OPEX responsibilities were not clearly defined early on. Differences in risk appetite may slow decision-making, particularly around offtake or regulatory engagement.

Another frequent challenge is governance. If one partner dominates decision-making or another feels excluded, trust can erode quickly. Cultural misunderstandings, especially across international lines, can compound the issue.

The solution often lies in clarity, transparency, and proactive facilitation. Neutral project managers and external advisors can mediate discussions, ensure balanced communication, and refocus teams on shared objectives.

How Poly Consulting Supports P2X Partnerships

At Poly Consulting, we specialise in helping companies form, structure, and manage strategic partnerships for P2X and green hydrogen projects. We support clients across every stage of the partnership lifecycle, from identifying and evaluating potential partners to drafting governance structures, identify and project manage the partnership workstreams, and support negotiation of the joint development agreements.

Our services include capability assessments, alignment workshops, negotiation support, and full project management of consortia. We also act as neutral facilitators, helping resolve conflicts and align cross-sector teams around shared milestones and investment goals.

Managing partnerships is time-consuming, complex, and often outside the comfort zone of even well-resourced organisations. With Poly as a trusted partner, you can move faster, reduce risk, and build lasting alliances in a rapidly evolving sector.

Let’s build the partnerships that power the energy transition together.

Elisabeth Hasselström
Head of Power, Utilities and Renewables
Elisabeth brings over a decade of expertise in the renewable energy sector, specializing in corporate strategy and in-house project development. Her journey began as an M&A advisor in banking for renewable companies, where she honed her insights before transitioning into consulting roles directly focused on Wind, Solar, Energy Storage (BESS), and Power-to-X projects.

Additionally, she is connected to an extensive network of highly skilled professionals within the Energy sector, enhancing her ability to support and drive impactful partnerships and projects.
Connect with Elisabeth
By clicking “Yes, I'm Happy”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Privacy Policy for more information.